Copyright © 2009 Wright Laboratories all rights reserved.

     However, legitimate scientific or professional skepticism will probably not be satisfied in the present research environment of Rife technology. Although the theoretical principals of the therapy does not contradict established sciences and cannot be credibly refuted by the basic sciences of Pathology, Chemistry, Pharmacology and Physics, it is still very often regarded as a fraudulent practice.  This is likely due to the preponderance of poor quality devices or the low percentage of genuine instruments that are produced in the US.
     It was predictable and inevitable that Rife technology would become popular amongst chiropractors, homeopaths, naturopaths, dentists, nurses, veterinarians, acupuncturists, etc, and this fact also contributes to the aura of the technology in the eyes of medical authority. These practices are often maligned by conventional medicine, not always justifiably. But the efficacy of the Rife technology has often been remarkable and for it to fall into the hands of unethical practitioners has both the effect of increasing the apparent success of otherwise medically unsuccessful practice, and of placing the technology in the same level of acceptability and credence as the practices in which it is so often used.
     The general lack of regulation in some of these practices, makes them a haven for quackery, which may be rightly seen as a tool of "calculated neglect" that encourages their vilification by conventional doctors and researchers. Homeopathic drugs, for example, are not subject to the same truth in advertising as conventional drugs, making them more vulnerable to invasion by unethical practitioners and thus attract ridicule unjustly, to those who are both sincere and efficacious. The end result of a lack of reasonable regulation being the appearance that these practices as a whole are a danger to the public, which is not a scientific judgement in the least, but more a means of manipulation of public sentiment. 
    Lack of reasonable regulation also means that products and equipment that is sold and marketed as Rife technology, may be nothing of the sort. There are many false Rife machines, and the promoters of these fall into a spectrum of classifications from outright frauds to the genuinely mistaken. It is also quite common for false Rife machines to adopt all the same words and phrases as are used to describe genuine Rife instruments, making it impossible even for experienced users to determine either the hardware value or efficacy as opposed to price.
     Dosages, amplitudes, wave forms, frequencies and session protocols all are without labeling requirements, acceptable standards, or authoritative training. This means that all of these critical factors are subject to arbitrary opinion and must certainly fall under the US House of Representatives definition of quackery, wether they are genuine or false machines and/or practitioners.
     Further mass confusion concerning the Rife technology stems from the very fact of its basic truths. The results possible from the use of a very feeble machine is often quite impressive the first time it is used. This is similar to many drugs, where the maximum notable effect occurs upon the first use. The long term effectiveness of the drug may taper off dramatically thereafter. Such a feeble machine does not display its diminished result and this is not evident to the user until after they have made a purchase. Feeble machines may be adequate to prove the theory, even in a scientific environment, but still fall short of having any real therapeutic or medicinal value. This one time only effect has been enough to convince even the most ardent skeptic and astute scientists and researchers should be aware that these effects are common and misleading.
     Rife machines are further stigmatized by a lack of approval compared to the perceived credibility and public acceptance of products that are approved and widely marketed in advertising media. It is the opinion of many drug examiners and approval preparers for drug companies that the present fast track approval process is even more a danger to the public than any snake oil, as evidenced by the mass recalls and withdrawals from the market of well known drugs. In these cases, it is obvious that the approval process is seriously compromised and wholly inadequate. Unlike the use of transducers and Rife machines, which have been in use for as much as a hundred years, new, unproven drugs are approved and placed on the market in as little as 5 months. It is simple logic to realize that until a product has been tested or used for at least 50 years, its long term side effects simply cannot be determined.
     There is real doubt of the value of the official approval of Rife machines. Hostile regulation is probably not better than no regulation at all. The motive for regulation is lacking since it is generally accepted that the technology is grandfathered and therefore except from conventional regulation. It is subject to fair trade and truthful advertising, however, and The Federal Trade Commission suggests that the technology is not proven. This claim is arguable, since it has been proven many times in many countries, and it is very easily proven when challenged to do so. Such a challenge is not expected, because it is widely understood that the true Rife technique is massively effective, a fact that some of it's opponents would prefer did not become public or common knowledge.