Of course, what we call Rife Technology today is really a concert of electro-medicine spanning a hundred years. It is Roy Rife whom we have made famous. His name is still associated with a whole panorama of techniques, most of which were not originated by Rife at all. But his fundamental principals of frequency application are an active part of nearly all therapeutic electro-medical devices.

There are a few basic concepts people should take into account. These are mostly common sense things, but they bear a review here.

In all cases, Rifeing is cheap therapy. It is really 21st century medicine, for the cost of electricity. How long it takes the machine to pay for it's self, depends on how much it gets used, but after that, it is the cheapest way to overcome many kinds of disease. As this message gets out into the third world, the Rife technique, in all it's forms, we predict, will continue to proliferate. So, in this sense, it should prove it's self, even to the most ardent skeptic, after it is approved and accepted by country after country. 

If you are doing comparisons of rhetoric on the web, as opposed to visiting and trying out the results firsthand, we may not be able to help you.

You can't know this or learn it on the web. You have to go and see it. We ask you not to take anyone's word for it. Since we feel there is a need to protect the Rife technology from fraud and misuse, we prefer that all potential customers see it and try it and get results before making any big decisions.

The reports we get are very much as would be expected from  technology that has been heralded as 100% cancer cure. The Scripps Clinic test years ago is always sited. For this reason, perhaps erroneously, the public has expectations that are extremely high. Far beyond anything that was ever really possible with the best of Royal Rife.

In New Zealand, and other countries, this therapy is covered by medical insurance and though still experimental, is one of the most popular alternative therapies available.

But to achieve 99% success, those clinics use everything else that they can to enhance the effects. Every supplement, every device. Success is not the same as cured.

The transducer we made for them delivers several additional, and equally effective modalities simultaneously. Electron therapy, diathermy, polarity, microbial electrocution, tissue stimulation and ionization of toxins are combined with frequency therapy. It isn't all about Rife.

Ray Tube enthusiasts and profiteers are talking as purists, which is frequency therapy only. The Ray tube is an essential clinical modality, but one which can never be more than a fraction of the gross effective value of more versatile transducer forms that make contact with the body.

More and more scientific proof of the Rife theory is becoming available to scientists and clinicians. But especially among those who have taken it upon themselves to seek out new or unorthodox methods to effect the outcome of disease.

New, more effective methods and protocols are being developed.

The standardization of much of the therapy, the long history of repeatable successes and our greatly improved customer support, means that new clinics will not be forced to rediscover as much of the technique as many have over the years.

We started in 1987 with the original data, and the original machines. We are probably the only company in the world whose device is based on the original. There are those who will try to tell you that the only true Rife machine is a "plasma device".  

The original use of the tube is still widely misunderstood. We say that the only true Rife machine is one that Rife actually made, and everything else is Rife-like, or Rife-style. Rife is enigmatic.     
 
Where we get into an argument with Ray Tube supporters, is that most available are just contraptions and truly unsafe, because of it.  Newer, better funded and also less ambitious attempts at Ray tube manufacture result in better reliability. Giving pepole more reasonable expectations wouldn't hurt either.
  
Due to the broadcast aspect, modern professional ray machines must be made for relatively weak output potentials. Nothing like what Rife was using, but made according to and employing frequency theory.

These are useful tools but they deliver frequency alone. Among other things, transducers make changes called endergonic reactions. Changes in the electrical/magnetic potentials of the body brings about a chemical change. This can often be the change that starts a new rally in the sufferer. Non-contacting devices like Ray machines can't do that.

The tube design is the perfect tool for demonstrating the frequency effect, and in this was the sort of simple science that scholars like to get their teeth into. That is, clear and understandable effects that are not so complicated they result in more theory than conclusion. Rife had endeavored to introduce too many new fundamental revelations for any one group, institution or industry to absorb all at once. Transducers have dosens of effects all at once, frequency effects being only one.
  
Since transducers have always been plentiful and Ray machines are not, private and laboratory experiments employ transducers. Transducer results are so spectacular in clinical tests that people become paralyzed to act for myriad reasons.

This is common even today. The dynamics of what a clinician must contend with in business often causes them to use extreme caution when discussing the nature of their electro-medical repertoire.

Perspective on it is the key to understanding it. When Rife could prove the electrocution of microbes via transducers, in the late 1920's, he didn't. Obviously, it would work even better if transducers utilized Rife's proven principals. It wasn't because he was willfully suppressing anything. He was, after all, bringing his own solution to the table. Transducer technologies were still under patent claims, so he prudently left it up to the transducer manufacturers to make their own discoveries.

Rife of course, didn't want to make it too obvious that similar effects could be achieved by a number of other means, since we was looking to sell his own products.

It was John Crane who began to debunk some of this Rife Ray propaganda, after Rife's death in ' 71. He later came right out with all of Rife's secrets, forthrightly trying to make a fortune doing it too. Crane's later digital machines confused things even more, since the performance of the digital transducer is often far less than expectations based on earlier technology.

For a while the real technology was lost. If it had ever been found. Crane was making machines capable of only 15-20% of the effect, and didn't know it. He may never have known that this was the reason he couldn't get the same results. A lot of people once doubted Crane because of all the failures. No one ever figured it out. Crane was always telling the truth, of course, he just failed to build a successful device with which to prove it.

Rife technology lost a lot of ground, and there were many inferior Rife machines, as there are today. But with nothing out there doing the job, Rife technology and interest was at an all time low from 1982-1995.

There were once hundreds of inventors and crackpots who tried to make an airplane fly. Of those only a handful ever got off the ground. Most of our competitors are floundering with this, and have been for years. We have been up and running more than a decade. That is why we speak with confidence.

This is not to suggest that all other makers are scams. Most, we would hope, are like us, and trying all the time to do better. Where folks pay too much for too little is often the problem.

It is not a practical endeavor, because the Model B is very expensive to make, and the profit is very small, most of which has to go to product support. Nevertheless, our most basic tenet is that all people who experiment with this therapy have the right to know the truth, and to have access to the real technology.

We have nothing to hide. We are the manufacturer, but we are not geared to convince you. That is not our job. If you are a skeptic (as you should be), then no one here is going to try to tell you what to think. We do not intend to try to prove anything. If you try using devices like these, you will have your own proof, whatever that is to be. We hope you will only do this safely. It is not recommended for persons with diabetes, epilepsy, or pacemaker to undertake this therapy without professional help.