Copyright © 2009 Wright Laboratories all rights reserved.

Do you have testimonials?

     Of course, we have testimonials going back a very long time. But testimonials are like employment references, in that no one prints the bad ones. If you buy a machine because they have ten testimonials that are impressive to you, you have no way of knowing what they really mean to you and your chances with that device. If the machine is only effective for one in a thousand cases, then your chances are only one in a thousand, but after they have sold ten thousand devices, they will have ten good testimonials.
     The FTC (federal trade commission) does not permit testimonials of so called unproven medical technologies. Although we do have a handful of very short quips and quotes from recent customers on the home page, they are related to JWLABS more than they are focused on any medical case or outcomes.
     We don't need the FTC to tell us that testimonials can be very misleading. In our records are many astounding testimonials, but the way we use them is different. We have never used them to convince people to buy machines from us. An amazing testimonial is no indication of how things will go for you. To suggest that would be unethical at best, and fraud at its worst. But we do collect them for future reference, and we do release them on occasion when we feel it will be helpful for a new user to examine what that user was doing.
     This does not exclude any other modality, supplements, or therapies they used in conjunction with the machine. Sometimes, their way of doing things is a real aid for new users to design a regimen for themselves based on what worked for others. But this is something that we will do only for existing users, and only when we have permission from the writer of the testimonial, so that in cases where symptoms and diagnosis are very similar, we can put people with common needs in touch with each other. This way the user has access to living testimonials, and can learn valuable and very specific information about what a successful therapy will really look like.
     Unfortunately, this type of referral is rare, since geography and similarities of conditions rarely coincide. More commonly telephone connections can be made, but even this is unusual, since the vast majority of users shrink from any exposure. In any event, user reports are fairly subjective, and reports tend to change over time, the user becoming less precise as time passes.
     It is our opinion, that it is unethical to use testimonials as a selling tool, because they are misleading. But it would also be unethical for us to deny them to people who have already purchased a JWLABS machine, and are looking for ways to do the therapy more effectively. When they apply and appear to offer real help, we share them gladly with our customers. Testimonals printed on this web site, if any, are intended as character references, nothing more.
     We want every customer to be successful. One of the ways we can assure this, is to see to it that each customer has a true and realistic expectation of what the machine can do for them. If we think their chances are great, we will not hesitate to say so. But if we think that person will need to treat for years with only small improvement, we will tell them the truth, as best we know it.
     In order for JWLABS to continue to be responsible stewards of the Rife technology, we must be scrupulously honest with every customer. We must also pay close attention to the circumstances of any reported failures. The vast majority of our customers are successful, and that success is exactly what our customers expect. So, they usually have little motivation to report success, because that is the norm. It is really only when things do not go as expected that we get most of our calls from customers. These are the cases from which we learn the most, and where we can use new information to improve our products and services.
     From our experience, and from testimonials, we have learned that if a dramatic turn around is going to occur, it is most often within the first ten days of full effect sessions. Examples of this are reports that a user got out of his death-bed, and continued to play golf everyday for months before he expired. A report that a woman got out of her death-bed, and went on a 10 month, care free vacation with her husband, before she expired. Two reports that users with terminal throat cancer, were diagnosed cancer free. A report from a practitioner that people with full blown AIDS are symptom free. All these happened in about 10 to 15 days of therapy.
Success is typical. The above reports are not. Given the physical limitations of the average person, a more reasonable expectation would correspond to the amount of time it takes for the body to make permanent metabolic changes. For example, one who has never exercised will reach a peak of physical toning from an intense exercise regimen in not less than 16 weeks. But for that same person to expect permanent metaboloc changes to occur, will take 6 months to a year, depending on their age.
     In our archives are many testimonials we have collected since we began manufacturing Rife machines. Also in our archives are the testimonials collected by John Crane and Royal Rife. These two sets of testimonials seem to correspond more or less exactly, with variations that seem to be attributable to the differences in the environment the mutations and incidences of disease.
     There is some considerable disparity between our collections which we know to be true, and those reported by makers of other Rife machines, which we do not know to be true. The percentage that these represent, variations of disease, and the apparent accuracy of those we do not know to be true, would suggest that at least some portion of the reports from other makers are fabricated, embellished, or mistaken. This is apparent for the reason that Rife machine successes have certain tell-tale markers that make them distinct from other success testimonials that are typically reported.
     We must look at all testimonials, regardless of source, with a skeptics eye. Results must be observed in a scientific experimental environment to have any real validity. There are simply too many ambiguities to take them at face value. Thrilling as some testimonials appear, these should never be the key factor in any buyer's decision process, nor should they be allowed to unduly influence established procedures.