As scientists, physicists, celebrities and other notables join the ranks of JWLABS users, it seems the basic argument concerning the use of audio frequency as opposed to radio frequency has been largely quieted. Amongst the many proponents of radio frequency output devices, however, it may never be put to rest. This long and tiresome argument must be placed in the context of Royal Rife's time frame, and tempered in my opinion, with his obvious business objectives.
     The transdermal stimulator, loosely referred to as a transducer, employing audio frequencies, was not Rife's invention. It made sense for him to attempt to establish a means of therapy that was his own, unique method, for patent and other purposes. I believe that this lies at the core of the argument. A similar motive is fundamental to the continuing argument, wherein, promoters of radio wave devices tout their "technology" which is unreasonably expensive. Having accumulated some considerable technical verbiage, much of their logic relies on postulated theories of the effects of radio as opposed to audio, according to Royal Rife and others. For this reason alone, these theories should be viewed suspiciously.
     In an article bearing the name; AAA Production Inc. Copyright 2003 & 2004 , entitled:
 A History Of Rife's Instruments And Frequencies, (updated 9-29-04), we see that they have put forth quite an effort in the attempt to suggest and to prove that a radio frequency carrier wave is essential to the therapy of frequency and to imply that audio frequencies cannot accomplish the job adequately. In addition to this, the writer has stated that direct electron contact cannot penetrate the cell.
     On the contrary, it is the transmitted radio signal that does not easily penetrate into the cell except at high power and frequency. Low frequency current penetrates every cell. In the research paper; Electroconformational Coupling dated 1989 , produced for the US Department of Defense, the latter contention is disproven with undeniable authority. Further, it is made clear that there are a host of other, very important endergonic effects of signal transductance, at the cellular level, via audio frequencies, (which cannot be accomplished by means of radio transmission), and these are explained scientifically.
     Most of this AAA article is arguing against square wave harmonics, and audio frequencies. On page 16 of the article, it is stated that the square wave output of the transducer was for the purpose of generating harmonics and thereby achieving "true Rife frequencies" indirectly.
     Here, I am forced to make an admission. That is, that of the many errors in the whole of the Rife material, including my own, there are a few which are typical, and profound errors. These errors are of the sort that few researchers will discover unless they have some real insight, and real experience. The basis for the contentions made in AAA article, are identical to the ones we at JWLABS examined before we endeavored to build even one instrument, back in 1987. We drew different conclusions. Realizing this was an important set of distinctions, albeit unpopular ones given the degree of respect Royal Rife had garnered, we decided to deliberately allow them to go uncorrected in our material because they would act as flags. In other words, certain innocent errors in the material, including but not limited to certain words and phrases, that had evidently always been present, would come up as bones of contention, and how these were used in such arguments as this, would provide us with clear separators for those who were genuine scientists, such as a learned physicist, as opposed to those who were simply arguing for the sake of defending their profits, much as Rife himself had done.